Quantum threats pose a real danger to our digital security right now. The year 2025 could mark a decisive moment that leaves our current encryption systems exposed to quantum computing capabilities.

Research shows something alarming. A quantum computer with enough power could crack RSA 2048 encryption in just 24 hours. Traditional supercomputers would need 10 septillion years to achieve the same result. The threat from quantum computing moves faster than anyone expected. Experts now predict a 17% to 34% probability of quantum computers breaking encryption by 2034. These odds jump to 79% by 2044.

We stand at a crucial point in cybersecurity’s evolution. This piece examines the vulnerabilities in your encryption methods, identifies the industries with the highest risk exposure, and shows you how to shield your organization from this approaching challenge.

What Makes Quantum Computing Different

Classical computers have served as the backbone of our digital world through a simple yet effective system. These machines process information using bits – microscopic switches that work in a binary state. They function just like tiny on-off switches ^[1]. The original bit represents either a 0 or 1, which creates the foundation of all digital operations we use daily.

How classical computers work

Classical computers’ basic architecture depends on binary processing, where data flows through circuits in a strictly sequential manner. These machines process calculations one after another as information passes through billions of transistors that exist in one state at a time ^[1]. The computing power grows linearly as we add more transistors, which creates a predictable scaling pattern ^[2].

Classical processors work through Boolean logic and make decisions based on clear yes-or-no scenarios. Every calculation breaks down into a series of binary choices, from simple arithmetic to complex database searches ^[1]. This approach works well for most everyday computing tasks because it offers reliability and predictability.

The power of quantum bits

Quantum computing brings a completely different approach through quantum bits, or qubits. Unlike classical bits, qubits utilize two basic properties of quantum mechanics: superposition and entanglement ^[2]. These properties create computational possibilities that outpace classical systems by a lot.

Qubits can exist in multiple states at once through superposition, instead of being limited to just 0 or 1 ^[1]. This ability lets quantum computers process huge amounts of information at the same time. On top of that, it makes changes to one qubit directly affect others when qubits become entangled, which speeds up information transfer ^[1].

The advantages become clear when we look at processing capabilities. A classical computer with N bits performs up to N calculations simultaneously, while a quantum computer can handle up to 2^N calculations ^[3]. So a quantum processor with just 10 qubits can process 1,024 calculations at once, while a classical processor stops at 10 ^[3].

Quantum computers show exponential power growth with each new qubit ^[1]. This feature stands out compared to classical computers, which only increase power linearly with added transistors. Quantum processors can also create complex, multidimensional computational spaces. They solve problems that would take classical computers thousands of years to figure out ^[4].

Current State of Encryption

Modern encryption serves as our best defense against unauthorized data access. Market Research Future expects the data encryption market to grow from USD 13.40 billion in 2022 to USD 38.50 billion by 2023 ^[5].

Common encryption methods

The digital world uses two basic approaches to encryption. Symmetric encryption works with a single private key that handles both encryption and decryption. This method proves quick and efficient, especially when securing large data volumes ^[6].

Asymmetric encryption, also called public key cryptography, uses two different keys. This system offers better security through its public and private key system ^[6]. Here are the most popular encryption standards:

• Advanced Encryption Standard (AES): The U.S. Government trusts this standard, which uses 128, 192, or 256-bit keys ^[5]
• RSA (Rivest-Shamir-Adleman): Internet data transmission relies on this public-key encryption ^[5]
• Blowfish: Known for its speed and success in e-commerce platforms ^[5]
• Twofish: Works well in both hardware and software environments ^[5]

Why they work now

Classical computers’ computational limits make current encryption methods work. Modern encryption schemes create security through complex math that makes unauthorized decryption impossible with today’s computing power ^[6].

In spite of that, recent data shows a worrying trend. A newer study, published in 2023 by Thales Group showed that only 20% of organizations encrypt 60% or more of their cloud data ^[5]. Just 45% of sensitive data gets encrypted ^[5].

Current encryption’s strength depends on key length and algorithm complexity. AES encryption stays immune to all but brute force attacks ^[5]. Private keys range from 128 to 256 bits, while public keys stretch to 2048 bits ^[5].

Symmetric encryption methods lead the way in large-scale data protection because they work faster. Public key cryptography offers better security for network data transmission ^[6]. This combination creates a reliable security system that protects sensitive information in storage and transit ^[7].

Why Quantum Threatens Encryption

Shor’s algorithm, created in 1994, opens the main gateway that quantum computers could use to destroy our current encryption methods. This quantum algorithm creates an unprecedented challenge to security systems we use every day.

How quantum breaks codes

Quantum computing threatens encryption because it knows how to solve complex mathematical problems that are the foundations of our security systems. A quantum computer with Shor’s algorithm could break RSA encryption keys containing more than 600 decimal digits using just 372 qubits ^[8]. Classical computers would need thousands of years to complete this same task.

Scientists estimate that quantum computers need about 20 million qubits to crack 2048-bit RSA integers within eight hours ^[9]. This might look like a huge number, but quantum computing technology advances so fast that reaching this requirement seems more possible each day.

The danger goes beyond RSA encryption. Quantum computers could break other crucial encryption schemes like:

• Diffie-Hellman key exchange protocols
• Elliptic curve cryptography (ECC)
• Advanced Encryption Standard (AES) with shorter key lengths

Timeline of the threat

We now see a clearer picture of the quantum computing threat timeline. Experts predict a 17% to 34% chance of having encryption-breaking quantum computers by 2034. This probability soars to 79% by 2044 ^[1].

Government agencies prepare for this future now. The U.S. Department of Homeland Security aims to switch to quantum-resistant systems by 2030 ^[1]. National Security Memorandum 10 requires all federal agencies to complete their move to post-quantum cryptography by 2035 ^[1].

Quantum computers keep getting better. IBM announced its Osprey chip that achieved 433 qubits ^[8]. The chip can’t break current encryption yet, but it shows how fast the field progresses. Chinese researchers have already factored a 15-digit number with a 10-qubit quantum computer ^[8].

The “harvest now, decrypt later” strategy worries experts the most. Bad actors collect encrypted data today and wait for powerful enough quantum computers to decrypt it ^[10]. This threatens data that needs long-term protection, such as government secrets, healthcare records, and financial information that must stay secure for decades.

Real Impact on Businesses

Quantum computing advances pose unprecedented challenges to businesses worldwide. A Deloitte survey shows that over half (50.2%) of professionals believe quantum-related cybersecurity threats put their organizations at risk ^[3].

Data security risks

“Harvest now, decrypt later” (HNDL) attacks represent the biggest problem today. Cybercriminals collect encrypted data and plan to decrypt it when quantum capabilities mature ^[11]. This threat affects organizations that manage sensitive data with confidentiality requirements lasting 5, 10, or maybe even 20 years ^[11].

The risk goes beyond immediate data breaches. Organizations that process and store large amounts of sensitive information over long periods face the highest risk ^[12]. Quantum computing threatens digital identities and raises questions about data authenticity, beyond traditional cybersecurity concerns ^[12].

Financial implications

Quantum-related cybersecurity breaches have staggering economic effects. Cybercrime costs the U.S. economy $100 billion annually and the global economy $450 billion each year ^[13]. Organizations face several financial pressures:

• Violations of regulatory compliance and potential fines
• Legal consequences when data protection fails
• Investment needs for quantum-safe security solutions
• Operational costs to update cryptographic systems ^[12]

Replacing encryption algorithms requires substantial resources, including:

• Updates to cryptographic libraries
• Tools for validation
• Hardware deployment
• Changes to operating systems
• Security protocol updates ^[13]

Customer trust issues

Customer trust erosion could be the most damaging long-term effect. Data breaches can harm an organization’s reputation, especially when customer well-being is at stake in finance and healthcare ^[12]. Large or repeated incidents could have severe consequences.

Businesses that manage personal data face intense scrutiny. The financial sector must protect transactions, accounts, and sensitive financial records while maintaining customer confidence ^[11]. Organizations handling medical records or government classified data face devastating consequences from breaches, including financial penalties, reputation damage, and legal problems ^[11].

Quantum threats alter the competitive landscape. Research teams and businesses could lose their market advantage if quantum-enabled attacks compromise their digital assets ^[12]. Data leaks can eliminate competitive advantages and weaken long-term market position ^[12].

Industries Most at Risk

Quantum computing advances put increasing pressure on sensitive data sectors. KPMG’s recent survey shows that 60% of organizations in Canada and 78% in the US believe quantum computers will become mainstream by 2030 ^[14].

Banking sector

The financial sector remains one of the most vulnerable to quantum threats. We relied heavily on asymmetric encryption to secure transactions and customer data. Banks handle data with long shelf lives and development cycles, making them perfect targets for harvest-now-decrypt-later attacks ^[15].

Today’s financial technologies depend on current encryption methods. Quantum computing threatens these security measures ^[16]. The Bank for International Settlements points out that quantum computers, though still experimental, could affect financial stability by breaking widely used cryptographic algorithms ^[17].

The G7 Cyber Expert Group, led by the U.S. Department of Treasury and Bank of England, highlighted three areas that need immediate attention:

• Development of quantum computing risk understanding
• Assessment of organizational vulnerabilities
• Creation of complete mitigation strategies ^[18]

Healthcare data

The healthcare sector faces equally big challenges with its own complications. Medical records must stay confidential for decades, making them attractive targets for quantum-enabled attacks. Healthcare organizations process more sensitive patient data every day, from genomics to drug discovery information ^[4].

Healthcare needs quantum-safe security quickly for several reasons. Patient records hold valuable Personally Identifiable Information (PII) that stays useful for years, making cybercriminals target them ^[19]. The connected nature of healthcare systems means a single weak point could expose entire networks of patient data ^[20].

Studies show healthcare organizations now recognize they need to change and reinforce their systems against quantum threats ^[20]. The sector struggles to protect different types of data:

• Electronic Health Records (EHR)
• Clinical research data
• Telemedicine communications
• Insurance information ^[21]

The healthcare industry’s complex digital infrastructure and critical operations make it more vulnerable. Patient confidentiality needs quantum-resistant methods to stop unauthorized access ^[20]. A breach today could affect privacy and well-being of countless people well into the future ^[4].

Signs Your System is Vulnerable

You need a full picture of your system’s weak points to spot signs of encryption vulnerability. Studies show that outdated algorithms, poor key management, and insecure protocol implementation lead to most cryptographic vulnerabilities ^[22].

Outdated encryption

Encryption algorithms don’t age well. Many organizations still use old encryption methods that put them at serious risk ^[2]. The numbers paint a worrying picture – many businesses continue to use outdated algorithms like MD5 for password hashing and file checksums ^[23].

Specific vulnerabilities highlight this danger. Around 850,000 websites still used TLS 1.0 or 1.1 in March 2020 ^[2]. Systems using 3DES, RC4, or 1024-bit RSA have been weak spots for years ^[2]. These old standards leave systems wide open to quantum computing attacks.

Legacy systems

Legacy IT systems create bigger security headaches as organizations depend on them for core operations. The data speaks for itself – over 66% of organizations use legacy applications for core operations, and more than 60% use them to interact with customers ^[24].

These old systems lack vital security features:

• Multi-factor authentication capabilities
• Single sign-on integration
• Role-based access controls
• Sufficient audit trails
• Modern encryption methods ^[24]

Risks multiply because legacy systems often connect to both internet and internal corporate networks ^[25]. These connections could become prime targets for quantum-enabled attacks, especially without proper monitoring and logging capabilities.

Integration gaps

Integration issues create major vulnerability risks. Most organizations handle certificate lifecycle processes by hand, including renewals and provisioning ^[26]. This manual approach becomes a real problem when entire certificate infrastructures need upgrades to quantum-resistant standards.

Multiple teams managing certificate processes adds complexity and often leads to dangerous variations in cryptographic standards ^[26]. These gaps in integration and oversight create what security experts call “spaghetti code” – systems that interconnect in ways that make security difficult ^[25].

Legacy databases make things worse by limiting transformation options. Enterprise digital transformation architects report this problem 85% of the time ^[25]. The core team spends too much time managing legacy system involvement, with 60% of architects noting this challenge ^[25].

Organizations must identify systems that vendors no longer support to guard against quantum threats ^[5]. Regular vulnerability checks help spot weaknesses, including outdated hardware and software that attackers could exploit ^[5]. A complete system hardening program and strong change control processes help tell the difference between planned updates and potentially dangerous changes ^[5].

Steps to Prepare Now

Organizations worldwide need to act now against the quantum threat. The US Office of Management and Budget projects that switching to post-quantum encryption will cost about USD 7.10 billion between 2025 and 2035 ^[27].

Risk assessment

Organizations must create a full picture of their cryptographic systems and assets ^[28]. This process identifies sensitive data, determines information lifespans, and evaluates what it all means for operations ^[6].

A detailed risk assessment should get into:

• Current cryptographic implementations
• Data sensitivity levels and retention requirements
• System vulnerabilities and exposure points
• Integration dependencies with external systems ^[6]

We involved technology vendors to discuss post-quantum roadmaps and understand their plans to implement quantum-safe cryptography ^[6]. Companies can create migration plans that give priority to the most sensitive and critical assets based on this evaluation ^[28].

Budget planning

Quantum readiness costs go beyond the original implementation expenses. The transition process needs substantial investment in hardware, software, and digital systems that meet post-quantum cryptography standards ^[27].

Organizations must set aside resources for:

• Hardware and software updates
• Implementation of validation tools
• Operating system modifications
• Security protocol revisions ^[27]

Companies should prepare both operationally and financially to modernize their systems ^[29]. They should also ensure their hardware and software architectures can adapt easily at the time changes become necessary ^[29].

Team training

Quantum computing threats are complex and require detailed team education. A recent survey showed that 86% of organizations feel unprepared for post-quantum cybersecurity ^[30]. Building skilled teams is vital to protect organizations against quantum threats ^[27].

Training programs should cover:

• Understanding emerging quantum threats
• Implementing post-quantum cryptography
• Developing risk mitigation strategies
• Managing cryptographic transitions ^[31]

Senior leadership needs quantum effect awareness training ^[14]. Custom workshops can address specific security needs and objectives, which helps teams develop practical skills to tackle quantum security challenges ^[31].

Organizations should build strong connections with relevant suppliers, regulators, and industry peers ^[29]. Success depends on cooperative efforts among financial institutions, technology providers, policymakers, and regulators to arrange planning, roadmaps, and concrete implementation steps ^[30].

Future-Proof Security Options

Digital assets now just need new encryption strategies to defend against quantum threats. The National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) has finalized its first set of encryption algorithms to withstand quantum computer attacks ^[32].

Post-quantum encryption

The U.S. Department of Commerce’s NIST completed an eight-year effort to develop post-quantum cryptography standards ^[32]. These standards mark a crucial milestone in cybersecurity’s development. They focus on two vital tasks: general encryption that protects information across public networks and digital signatures that authenticate identities ^[32].

NIST’s standardization project brought together the world’s leading cryptography experts to create and assess algorithms resistant to both conventional and quantum computer attacks ^[32]. Different mathematical problems challenge both traditional and quantum computers in these selected algorithms ^[32].

NIST’s post-quantum cryptography project has produced three finalized standards ready to use now ^[32]. These standards include:

• CRYSTALS-Kyber for general encryption
• CRYSTALS-Dilithium as the primary algorithm for digital signatures
• SPHINCS+ as a backup solution using different mathematical approaches ^[33]

These new standards replace mathematical problems that quantum computers solve easily with challenges that stump both classical and quantum systems ^[7]. NIST continues to assess additional algorithms as potential backup standards ^[32].

Quantum-safe algorithms

Quantum-safe algorithms draw their strength from their mathematical foundation. CRYSTALS-Kyber, the choice for general encryption, works efficiently to protect information exchanged across public networks ^[33]. CRYSTALS-Dilithium serves as the main algorithm for digital signatures, while FALCON offers an option when smaller signatures are needed ^[33].

Note that symmetric cryptography stays relatively secure against quantum attacks ^[34]. To name just one example, a scaled quantum computer would take over 7 billion centuries to break AES encryption ^[34]. Companies should prioritize replacing vulnerable public key algorithms like RSA and Elliptic Curve Cryptography ^[34].

Moving to quantum-safe cryptography requires a complete approach. The National Security Agency (NSA), Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA), and NIST recommend these key steps ^[28]:

1. Create a quantum-readiness roadmap
2. Talk with technology vendors about post-quantum implementation plans
3. Develop migration strategies that prioritize critical assets
4. Make thorough inventories of cryptographic systems

Whatever approach they choose, organizations must remember that cryptographic diversity remains vital for overall security ^[35]. A single algorithm or approach could create vulnerabilities if compromised.

Multiple layers of protection, including post-quantum encryption standards and quantum key distribution, provide the most reliable defense against future threats ^[8]. This layered approach ensures other protections remain even if one security measure fails.

IBM’s researchers worked with industry and academic partners to develop two post-quantum cryptographic algorithms: ML-KEM (formerly CRYSTALS-Kyber) and ML-DSA (formerly CRYSTALS-Dilithium) ^[7]. These algorithms now run in IBM z16™ cloud systems, proving they work in practice ^[7].

The switch to quantum-safe cryptography represents a long-term, intensive community effort that needs strong collaboration between government and industry ^[28]. Organizations should start this process today instead of waiting until quantum computers threaten current encryption methods ^[28].

Conclusion

Our current encryption systems just need immediate attention and action because of the quantum computing threat. Organizations must make a crucial choice – they should prepare now or risk devastating data breaches once quantum computers break existing encryption methods.

Unprepared organizations are running out of time. Malicious actors collect encrypted data and wait for quantum computers to become powerful enough to decrypt it. NIST has released quantum-safe encryption standards, but most businesses continue to rely on vulnerable systems.

Organizations can protect themselves by taking three crucial steps. They should assess their current encryption vulnerabilities first. A detailed quantum-readiness roadmap comes next. The final step involves implementing post-quantum cryptography standards, especially when you have data that needs long-term protection.

Banks and healthcare organizations face the highest risk from harvest-now-decrypt-later attacks, so they should act quickly. Their transition to quantum-safe systems becomes more complex and time-consuming due to regulatory requirements.

The quantum threat may appear distant today. Organizations that begin their security preparations now will protect their data better. They will maintain customer trust and ensure business continuity as we enter the quantum era. Waiting until quantum computers break current encryption will be too late.

FAQs

Q1. How does quantum computing threaten current encryption methods? Quantum computers can potentially break widely used encryption algorithms like RSA and ECC by solving complex mathematical problems much faster than classical computers. This capability could render current encryption methods ineffective, putting sensitive data at risk.

Q2. When are quantum computers expected to pose a significant threat to encryption? Experts predict a 17% to 34% chance of having encryption-breaking quantum computers by 2034, with this probability rising to 79% by 2044. Some government agencies are already preparing for this threat, with deadlines for transitioning to quantum-resistant systems set as early as 2030.

Q3. Which industries are most vulnerable to quantum computing threats? The banking and healthcare sectors are particularly at risk due to their reliance on long-term data security. Financial institutions manage sensitive transaction data, while healthcare organizations handle confidential patient records that must remain secure for decades.

Q4. What steps can organizations take to prepare for the quantum threat? Organizations should conduct thorough risk assessments of their current cryptographic systems, develop quantum-readiness roadmaps, allocate budget for necessary upgrades, and provide team training on quantum security. It’s also crucial to engage with technology vendors about their post-quantum implementation plans.

Q5. Are there any encryption methods that can withstand quantum attacks? Yes, post-quantum encryption algorithms are being developed to resist both classical and quantum computer attacks. The National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) has finalized its first set of quantum-resistant encryption standards, including CRYSTALS-Kyber for general encryption and CRYSTALS-Dilithium for digital signatures.

References

[1] – https://www.securityweek.com/cyber-insights-2025-quantum-and-the-threat-to-encryption/
[2] – https://www.infosecinstitute.com/resources/cryptography/security-risks-of-outdated-encryption-is-your-data-really-secure/
[3] – https://www.securityinfowatch.com/cybersecurity/information-security/managed-network-security/article/53012965/the-cybersecurity-implications-of-quantum-computing
[4] – https://www.qusecure.com/quantum-resilient-data-security-in-healthcare-a-critical-imperative/
[5] – https://www.securityinfowatch.com/cybersecurity/article/53081992/mitigating-the-security-risks-of-legacy-it-systems
[6] – https://www.cyber.gc.ca/sites/default/files/cyber/publications/itsap00017-e.pdf
[7] – https://www.ibm.com/think/topics/quantum-safe-cryptography
[8] – https://www.forbes.com/councils/forbestechcouncil/2024/12/10/how-to-prep-cryptographic-assets-for-the-emerging-quantum-era/
[9] – https://www.technologyreview.com/2019/05/30/65724/how-a-quantum-computer-could-break-2048-bit-rsa-encryption-in-8-hours/
[10] – https://www.cryptomathic.com/blog/quantum-computing-and-its-impact-on-cryptography
[11] – https://kpmg.com/dp/en/home/insights/2024/04/quantum-and-cybersecurity.html
[12] – https://www.quantropi.com/the-threat-of-quantum-computing-and-what-businesses-can-do-about-it/
[13] – https://www.marshmclennan.com/insights/publications/2022/october/quantum-computing-will-breach-your-data-security.html
[14] – https://kpmg.com/au/en/home/insights/2024/04/cyber-security-risk-from-quantum-computing.html
[15] – https://www.spiceworks.com/it-security/security-general/guest-article/post-quantum-cryptography-nine-industries-at-risk-from-y2q/
[16] – https://www.forbes.com/councils/forbestechcouncil/2022/11/08/13-risks-that-come-with-the-growing-power-of-quantum-computing/
[17] – https://www.bis.org/publ/bppdf/bispap149.htm
[18] – https://www.secureworld.io/industry-news/g7-quantum-computing-risks-finance
[19] – https://www.medicaldesignbriefs.com/component/content/article/51480-how-quantum-computing-will-impact-healthcare-data-encryption
[20] – https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11141384/
[21] – https://www.business-standard.com/content/specials/quantum-security-for-healthcare-a-global-shift-towards-quantum-secure-cryptography-124111201053_1.html
[22] – https://www.shadowdetect.com/cryptographic-vulnerabilities/
[23] – https://www.globalsign.com/en/blog/security-risks-outdated-encryption
[24] – https://www.spiceworks.com/tech/devops/guest-article/the-growing-risks-of-legacy-systems/
[25] – https://sync-sys.com/5-ways-your-legacy-systems-may-add-to-cybersecurity-risks/
[26] – https://www.appviewx.com/blogs/why-is-it-dangerous-to-use-outdated-cryptography-standards/
[27] – https://cybelangel.com/quantum-safe-cybersecurity/
[28] – https://www.nsa.gov/Press-Room/Press-Releases-Statements/Press-Release-View/Article/3498776/post-quantum-cryptography-cisa-nist-and-nsa-recommend-how-to-prepare-now/
[29] – https://www.mckinsey.com/capabilities/mckinsey-digital/our-insights/when-and-how-to-prepare-for-post-quantum-cryptography
[30] – https://www.europol.europa.eu/media-press/newsroom/news/call-for-action-urgent-plan-needed-to-transition-to-post-quantum-cryptography-together
[31] – https://securequantum.com/quantum-security-awareness-training
[32] – https://www.nist.gov/news-events/news/2024/08/nist-releases-first-3-finalized-post-quantum-encryption-standards
[33] – https://www.nist.gov/news-events/news/2022/07/nist-announces-first-four-quantum-resistant-cryptographic-algorithms
[34] – https://quantum.microsoft.com/en-us/vision/quantum-cryptography-overview
[35] – https://www.boozallen.com/insights/ai-research/post-quantum-cryptography-explained.html